Image

3:30 AM / Tuesday January 21, 2020

7 Aug 2011

Breitbart’s bid to toss Shirley Sherrod’s defamation lawsuit rejected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
August 7, 2011 Category: Stateside Posted by:

eurweb.com

 

Conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart has failed in his attempt to knock out a defamation lawsuit by former U.S. Department of Agriculture official Shirley Sherrod, who is suing on grounds that a video of her was deceptively edited to portray her as racist.

 

Breitbart attempted to leverage DC’s new anti-SLAPP law by claiming Sherrod’s lawsuit was an impingement on his free speech, but a federal judge has denied that motion as well as another to move the case to California.

 

Sherrod is suing Breitbart, Breitbart’s colleague Larry O’Connor and an unnamed defendant over the release of a video clip and accompanying text on Breitbart’s website claiming the video offered proof that Sherrod, who is black, discriminated against white farmers. Sherrod, in her complaint, argues Breitbart made defamatory accusations of racism based on a “deceptively edited” clip that was taken out of context.

 

Breitbart and O’Connor had argued that they were engaging in protected speech under the First Amendment when they posted the clip and comments online. They also argued that if the case is not dismissed, it should be moved to U.S. District Court for Central California because it’s where Breitbart and O’Connor live and work on the Web-based businesses in question.

Image

 

O’Connor’s attorney, Bruce Sanford of Washington’s Baker & Hostetler, in a statement this morning, reiterated his client’s belief that Sherrod “cannot form the basis of a libel action under longstanding American defamation law.”

 

“Anyone who looks at the tape of her speech or the excerpts put up by Andrew Breitbart can see that we are in the realm of pure opinion,” he said.

 

Breitbart and O’Connor are among the first parties in Washington to invoke D.C.’s new anti-SLAPP law, which went into effect March 31 and offers an early remedy, in the form of a special motion to dismiss that stays discovery pending resolution, for defendants who believe they are being sued over protected speech.

 

Sherrod challenged the applicability of the law in federal court and also argued that the defendants were time-barred from filing.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Leave a Comment

Recent News

Commentary

Celebrating Dr. King As A Warrior, Not A Dreamer

January 16, 2020

Tweet Share Pin Email ABOVE PHOTO: Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial (Photo: Shutterstock) By A. Peter Bailey...

Travel

Smooth Traveler: Montgomery, Alabama (Part Two)

January 18, 2020

Tweet Share Pin Email ABOVE PHOTO: Freedom Riders Museum  (Photos: Renée S. Gordon) By Renée S. Gordon...

Food And Beverage

Go long on game day: Ready-for-action recipes to feed fans

January 17, 2020

Tweet Share Pin Email Family Features When game day arrives and your crowd is ready to crank...

Entertainment

Johnson Publishing artwork going on auction block

January 16, 2020

Tweet Share Pin Email CHICAGO (AP) — Bankrupt Johnson Publishing Co., the former owner of Ebony and...

Color Of Money

Shoppers: Make protecting yourself from fraudsters part of your New Year’s resolutions

January 17, 2020

Tweet Share Pin Email BPT With a new decade upon us, it is natural to look to...

Horoscopes

SUNscopes for the week of Jan. 19

January 17, 2020

Tweet Share Pin Email All Signs: Each year, the Sun travels through all 12 signs, which gives...

The Philadelphia Sunday Sun Staff