Image

8:24 AM / Tuesday January 31, 2023

21 May 2016

Councilwoman introduces non-reusable container tax as sustainable source of revenue

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
May 21, 2016 Category: Local Posted by:

ABOVE PHOTO:  Councilwoman Blondell Reynolds Brown

As an alternative means to fund Mayor Jim Kenney’s Universal Pre-K, community schools and rebuild initiatives, Councilwoman Blondell Reynolds Brown introduced a non-reusable container tax bill.

The legislation defines a non-reusable beverage container as an “individual, separate, and sealed glass, metal, or plastic bottle, can, jar, or carton, not ordinarily collected from consumers for refilling, that contains a beverage of more than seven fluid ounces, and is intended for consumption off premises.”

Beverages that are not taxable include baby formula, milk products, fountain drinks and those that are sold at restaurants and any beverage that is in a container of seven fluid ounces or less (such as Juicy Juice).

Taxable items include any soft drink, whether or not carbonated (such as cola, ginger ale, root beer, or sarsaparilla); any soda water, carbonated water, natural or artificial water, natural or spring water, or flavored water; natural or artificial ready-to-drink tea; natural or artificial ready-to-drink coffee; or artificial vegetable juice; and energy drink.

A tax bill of this nature broadens the scope of taxable items and is projected to yield a minimum of $64 million dollars at a rate of 15 cents per container. If the tax bill is imposed, an 11 ounce bottle of Perrier sparkling mineral water would be taxed at the equivalent of 1.36 cents per ounce, and a family sized iced tea would be taxed at the equivalent of roughly .117 cents per ounce.

“If the goal is to provide a sustainable proposal that will allow for Universal Pre-K for all , improvements and access to recreation centers for all and community schools for all, then the tax should impact all–from soda to Perrier,” Councilwoman Reynolds Brown emphasized.

“The legislation symbolizes shared sacrifice and does not focus on one specific group, product or industry,” said Councilwoman.  “Therefore, it is less regressive, more sustainable and equitable.”

“From the very beginning of this process, my office has asked for alternatives.  This legislation fosters continued discussion, conversation and debate about how we fund these essential programs.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Leave a Comment

Recent News

Local

Office of Economic Opportunity debuts virtual educational series to advance pathways toward generational wealth

January 30, 2023

Tweet Share Pin Email  PHILADELPHIA – The Department of Commerce, Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO) is advancing...

Suburban News

Black History Month events in Montgomery County 

January 30, 2023

Tweet Share Pin Email Here is a listing of this year’s upcoming events. All will be held...

Stateside

Pennsylvanians encouraged to use myPATH to file 2022 PA tax returns

January 30, 2023

Tweet Share Pin Email With the opening of tax filing season, the Department of Revenue is encouraging...

Color Of Money

Preparing for tax season: Three tips to keep your documents organized

January 27, 2023

Tweet Share Pin Email BPT Taxes can be a daunting task. Some people are so anxious that...

Health

What is DME and why it matters if you have diabetes

January 27, 2023

Tweet Share Pin Email BPT Whether you have Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes, or are a...

Food And Beverage

What’s Cookin’? 7 Bean Stew

January 27, 2023

Tweet Share Pin Email Tweet Share Pin Email Related Posts What’s Cookin’?: 7 Bean Stew What’s Cookin’?...

The Philadelphia Sunday Sun Staff