Image

2:12 PM / Friday December 2, 2022

17 Feb 2017

We’ve Got Issues

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
February 17, 2017 Category: Commentary Posted by:

ABOVE CARTOON:  (Nate Beeler, The Columbus Dispatch)

According to a coalition of community groups, Pennsylvania doesn’t have a friend in Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch.

By Denise Clay

When President Donald Trump announced that he had chosen Judge Neil Gorsuch to be his nominee for the Supreme Court seat that’s sat vacant since the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, advocacy groups decided to take a long, hard look at the nominee.

At a news conference on Monday in Philadelphia’s City Hall, representatives of many of these advocacy groups got together to let Trump — and by extension Pennsylvania Sens. Pat Toomey and Bob Casey — know that not only were they not pleased with the selection, but that they should all expect representatives of these groups to pay them a visit and soon.

Organized by Why Courts Matter-PA, groups including Planned Parenthood, POWER (Philadelphians Organized to Witness, Empower and Rebuild), Cease Fire-PA, the Conservation Voters of Pennsylvania and Equality PA, elaborated on their concerns.

Because some of the actions that the Trump Administration has taken in it’s early days have given many cause for concern, having a judiciary that won’t rubberstamp anything the President does is important, said Jeff Garis, Outreach and Engagement Director of Why Courts Matter-PA.

If Judge Gorsuch’s record is any indication, there’s no reason to believe that he’ll stand up to the President’s more unconstitutional impulses, Garis said.

“There’s already an exceedingly high bar for any nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court,” he said. “But Donald Trump’s executive actions that discriminate against Muslim Americans and his subsequent attacks on a federal judge raise the bar even higher. Judge Gorsuch, though, doesn’t come anywhere near that bar.”

For example, Garis said, Judge Gorsuch’s decision making shows too much of a willingness to give corporations the benefit of the doubt.

“His record shows a significant history of putting corporations over people, making it harder for us to hold Wall Street accountable,” Garis said. “And he’s not the independent, open-minded Justice that the Court requires now more than ever.”

The perception of a lack of open-minded independence on Judge Gorsuch’s part came up numerous times during the press conference, which was held in City Council’s caucus room.

Many of the reservations expressed by the coalition of organizations were connected to things that Philadelphians view as problematic. For example, in a city where gun violence is an issue, keeping guns out of the hands of felons is of paramount importance.

That seems to be a blind spot with Judge Gorsuch, said Dave Scholnick, a Cease Fire-Pennsylvania board member.

“As our elected leaders review Judge Gorsuch’s qualifications, they have to carefully consider his apparent reluctance to keep guns out of the hands of felons,” he said. “We all agree with current law prohibiting those convicted of felonies from possessing guns, so it’s important to question anyone whose judgements have veered so far from the mainstream. Letting felons possess guns with impunity undermines law enforcement and endangers our communities.”

In a city where poverty is an overriding issue, having a Justice on the Supreme Court who doesn’t see the issues of the poor as important can be problematic, said the Rev. Greg Holston, executive director of POWER.

“Our faith informs our action, and our faith tells us that we’re suppose to feed the hungry, and clothe the naked,” Holston said. “We’re supposed to minister to them that are sick, we’re supposed to visit them that are in prison. That we’re supposed to defend the widowed and the motherless. That we’re supposed to defend the poor, and we’re supposed to protect against the exploitation of our workers. Well everything I just said, from the history of this particular nominee, shows that he does not care about interest of the least of these, but he cares about the interests of those who have the most of everything.”

Members of the Why Courts Matter-PA coalition plan on going to Washington, D.C. to let their feelings be known regarding the appointment.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Leave a Comment

Recent News

Local

Message from Catherine Hicks Philadelphia Branch NAACP President and Publisher of the SUN on passing of former PA Senator T. Milton Street

November 29, 2022

Tweet Share Pin Email The Philadelphia Branch NAACP and the Philadelphia SUN family, is saddened to hear...

Stateside

Senate runoff: Obama heading to Georgia

December 1, 2022

Tweet Share Pin Email By BILL BARROW and JEFF AMY ATLANTA (AP) — Georgia voters have cast...

Week In Review

Health harms of mass shootings ripple across communities

December 2, 2022

Tweet Share Pin Email ABOVE PHOTO: Briana Tyler speaks with The Associated Press and uses her hands...

Politics

Jeffries wins historic bid to lead House Dems after Pelosi

December 2, 2022

Tweet Share Pin Email ABOVE PHOTO: Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., talks with reporters on Capitol Hill in...

Health

Do you have the winter sniffles? Five ways you can manage indoor winter allergies

December 2, 2022

Tweet Share Pin Email BPT Do you suffer from itchy eyes, a runny nose or a scratchy...

Color Of Money

Feeling the stress of high energy bills?  New programs help lower costs

December 2, 2022

Tweet Share Pin Email BPT  Soaring energy prices equate to rising energy bills for households nationwide. This...

The Philadelphia Sunday Sun Staff