Why Obama must stand firm on taxing the wealthy
ABOVE PHOTO: Pres. Brack Obama.
(AP photo)
ByEarl Ofari Hutchinson
President Obama has heard every argument from the GOP, the gaggle of conservative economists, and financial analysts on why it's foolhardy to press for a tax hike on the wealthy. The hike won't come close to raising the revenue needed to avert the fiscal cliff. It will stunt business growth and drive the economy into another recession. The wealthy already pay more than their fair of taxes while millions of Americans on the bottom income rung pay nothing. It hopelessly poisons the political well and insures virtual warfare with the GOP on other legislative initiatives.
Countless private and governmental budget and business studies from and political history show this to be a toxic mix of economic falsehoods and political bluster. The Bush tax cuts were in effect during every minute of Obama's first term. Yet for every month except one of his first term unemployment never dipped below the much touted perilous breaking point figure of 8 percent. Meanwhile, corporations and the financial industry magnates hoarded tens of billions of cash. Their stockpiled cash total now stands at a near record 1.7 trillion dollars. This could have bankrolled thousands of small and medium sized businesses, expanded production and sales, created thousands of new jobs, and generated millions in tax revenues. This would have been the major boost that rejuvenated the economy that the GOP endlessly claims that forcing the wealthy to pay more will kill.
In truth, Obama's relatively modest hikes on the wealthy violate a sacrosanct premise, actually two premises, that the GOP has based much of its political existence on. One is that government is too big, wasteful and intrusive. The other is that those who appear to benefit most from government should pay the most for it. The big wasteful, intrusive government line spans nearly a century of GOP politics. It has been used as a political ram to batter Democratic presidents. It was used against FDR's New Deal, Truman's Fair Deal Program that included a push for national health care, LBJ's Great Society jobs and education spending programs, and to pressure JFK and Clinton into tax cuts that directly benefited corporations and the wealthy.
The real aim in the GOP's mania to shield the rich from higher taxes is to further bulk up the private sector and radically chop down government. Taxes have always been its convenient, and crowd pleasing weapon to accomplish that.
This tracks directly to the GOP's other sacred belief that the lower end workers, and the poor are in essence leeches that feed at the government trough at the expense of upper income earners and the wealthy. This is just as bogus. A study by the nonprofit Annie E. Casey Foundation and the Corporation for Enterprise Development found that the top 5 percent of taxpayers got the overwhelming lion's share of the nearly $400 billion that the federal government spent on tax breaks and other wealth building strategies in 2009. The major corporations have fared even better. The Tax Foundation in a 2010 report found that corporations will be showered with more than $600 billion in government entitlements spread over the next five years in the form of an array of tax breaks and loopholes.
The partial checklist of those breaks include Graduated Corporate Income Credit, Inventory Property Sales, Research and Experimentation Tax Credit, Deferred Taxes for Financial, Firms on Certain Income Earned Overseas, Alcohol Fuel Credit, Credit for Low-Income Housing Investments, Accelerated Depreciation of Machinery and Equipment, the Deduction for Domestic Manufacturing, Exclusion of Interest on State and Local Bonds, and Deferral of Income from Controlled Foreign Corporations.
How much of the tens of billions they'll receive from these government entitlements will actually go toward business expansion and job creation is subject to question. One thing that is not open to debate is that few GOP leaders will go to the barricades to slash or end against these entitlements that drain the federal budget of vast revenues. Yet they'll continue to rail against expenditures on food stamps as a prime government revenue drain.
The GOP figured that waging a fierce political, media and public relations campaign against Obama's tax hikes for the wealthy would be a can't miss tactic to rally conservatives, the business community, and a significant number of Americans that genuinely believe government spending and power is way out of control. Even more of a sweetener, that it is an issue that can take some of the luster off of Obama's decisive presidential win by tarring him as an autocratic, power grabbing, tax and spend business and budget buster.
It hasn't worked. Polls show that a majority of Americans favor hiking taxes on the rich and preserving entitlement programs that benefit the middle and working class, and even the poor. This won't stop the GOP, though, from still waging its age old battle to protect the rich and batter a Democratic president on its straw man issue of no tax increases for the rich. That in itself is more than reason enough why President Obama must stand firm on taxing the wealthy.
Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. He is a frequent political commentator on MSNBC and a weekly co-host of the Al Sharpton Show on American Urban Radio Network. He is the author of How Obama Governed: The Year of Crisis and Challenge. He is an associate editor of New America Media. He is the host of the weekly Hutchinson Report on KPFK-Radio and the Pacifica Network.
Follow Earl Ofari Hutchinson on Twitter: http://twitter.com/earlhutchinson
+ Top Story
President Barack Obama’s appointment of UN Ambassador Susan Rice as his National Security Adviser was a great move for two reasons. Rice has the same superb qualifications that would have made her an exemplary Secretary of State.
Eighty-eight years after the birth on May 19, 1925, and 48 years after the assassination of black nationalist leader Malcolm X, the tragedy and triumph of his life and work still clouds and uplifts us. The years have seen Malcolm ignored, reviled, and praised.
Sometimes, white privilege isn't about stuff. It's not always about better opportunities, or more money, or even greater access to those things than people of color. Sometimes, white privilege is as simple as knowing that, generally speaking, if you're white, you'll be perceived as competent and hard-working until proven otherwise...
If Charles Ramsey is an American hero or another American casualty of media-induced racial stereotyping or both after helping save the lives of the three kidnapped Cleveland women, one thing is now clear. Ramsey has done the seemingly impossible. He's turned racial stereotyping on its head.
African Americans have spent much of our history fighting for equal treatment. Just two generations ago, our parents and our grandparents were banned from eating at certain restaurants, attending certain schools, and working in certain professions.
When then President George W. Bush submitted the names of his judicial court nominee picks it took the Senate on average 18 days to take a vote on his picks. When now President Obama submits the names of his judicial court picks it takes 132 days on average to get a Senate vote on them.
President Obama’s cautious admonition not to rush to judgment about the Boston Marathon terror bombing until all the facts were in put a momentary check on the media and some in the public who were rushing to spew the perennial “Muslim terrorists” did it line.
The fact that I didn't go any further than calling him useless was my being nice. If I said what I really felt about Sen. Reid, then you could call me mean. In fact, you could feasibly ask me if I kissed my late Mother with that mouth....