Who's missing? The undecided voter who is not being courted by either Presidential campaign
By Weldon McWilliams IV, PhD
After watching the first Presidential debate I must admit that I was not really impressed by either candidate but I will also admit that Gov. Romney seemed much more prepared than he has looked on the campaign trail. There are still many questions that remain even after this debate; whose economic policy will produce more jobs, which candidate is more likely to reduce the deficit, how will they specifically go about reducing the budget?
These are just a few of the many that remain, however the question that I asked myself as I watched this debate is what would the most disadvantaged, unprivileged, marginalized citizen get from this debate. Sadly I believe this citizen would feel left out of the minds of both candidates. Romney's policies seem to focus on how to keep the upper class comfortable (although in this debate some of his positions would make the wealthy class question if he is looking out for them), and Obama's rhetoric was filled with his desire to strengthen the middle class.
For the citizen whose family hovers over the poverty line ($23,050 for a family of four), there was not much substance that they could take from this debate with the hopes that perhaps their reality could change. Issues that the poor and underprivileged face on a regular basis are not being addressed in this election by the two major parties. Many citizens that fit in this category live in cities that are filled with crime and blight, and these are not issues mentioned in the platform of either candidate.
Violence and crime has been a part of the American story for as long as America had been around, however the issue of crime and how to deal with it has not come up in this election. Crime is an issue that the underclass must deal with everyday. Many have come to believe that those who are poor are disproportionally the ones perpetuating the crimes, but if this is true (although there is much statistical information to combat that notion) then they are also disproportionally the ones who must deal with the aftermaths of crime as well.
If I live in an unsafe neighborhood, which candidate is speaking to my concern on how to make my neighborhood safer? Some may say that the particular issue is one that is mainly for the state and local governments. If this is the case, then the state/local governments have failed in their efforts to curb violence in many underprivileged communities.
Many state and local governments are more concerned over how to bring business and economic revitalization and more often than not, the funds that are given and to be used by the state often times are directed toward that effort. If one were to look at state budgets, they would be hard pressed to find funds that are used specifically and/or designed to aid residents in communities in which violent crimes occur more often then they should.
The government has proven in the past with policies such as FDR's New Deal and LBJ's Great Society, that they have the capacity to see to it that economic relief and employment opportunity also finds itself available to the underclass.
There are those who believe that one of the many ways to combat violence is to create jobs. I often wonder if the poorest citizens of the country feel left out of this debate as well. For both candidates the approach to job creation for are seemingly exclusionary of the poor citizen. For Gov. Romney, job creation will come from the top and trickle down. It is important to encourage the wealthy owners (through tax cuts) to create new jobs and hire new employees. For Pres. Obama, job creation comes from a "middle out" approach. It is important to give tax cuts for the middle class.
The hope is by putting more money into their pockets, it would encourage spending and increased consumerism would lead to jobs creating new jobs to meet the demand. Both of these ideas exclude any prescription for the citizen that is either below or around the poverty line. Whether the approach is a trickle down from the top, or trickle down from the middle, skepticism of trickle down economics should be understandable. Since the days of its promotion through President Ronald Reagan, the economic benefits of the "trickle-down" approach still has yet to reach the underprivileged class of America.
Both candidates have not identified their plans for the underclass. The next Presidential debate is scheduled for Tuesday Oct. 16 at Hofstra University, and the focus of the debate will center on domestic and foreign policy. I challenge both candidates to put forth a plan that will empower the underclass as well as the middle and upper class.
Both candidates want their supporters to believe that they not only have the intellect to obtain the presidency but also the compassion to care for all citizens. If this is indeed so then I encourage both candidates to add to their platform a case that will display that they too care for the "...least of these brethren," and sistren.
+ Top Story
President Barack Obama’s appointment of UN Ambassador Susan Rice as his National Security Adviser was a great move for two reasons. Rice has the same superb qualifications that would have made her an exemplary Secretary of State.
Eighty-eight years after the birth on May 19, 1925, and 48 years after the assassination of black nationalist leader Malcolm X, the tragedy and triumph of his life and work still clouds and uplifts us. The years have seen Malcolm ignored, reviled, and praised.
Sometimes, white privilege isn't about stuff. It's not always about better opportunities, or more money, or even greater access to those things than people of color. Sometimes, white privilege is as simple as knowing that, generally speaking, if you're white, you'll be perceived as competent and hard-working until proven otherwise...
If Charles Ramsey is an American hero or another American casualty of media-induced racial stereotyping or both after helping save the lives of the three kidnapped Cleveland women, one thing is now clear. Ramsey has done the seemingly impossible. He's turned racial stereotyping on its head.
African Americans have spent much of our history fighting for equal treatment. Just two generations ago, our parents and our grandparents were banned from eating at certain restaurants, attending certain schools, and working in certain professions.
When then President George W. Bush submitted the names of his judicial court nominee picks it took the Senate on average 18 days to take a vote on his picks. When now President Obama submits the names of his judicial court picks it takes 132 days on average to get a Senate vote on them.
President Obama’s cautious admonition not to rush to judgment about the Boston Marathon terror bombing until all the facts were in put a momentary check on the media and some in the public who were rushing to spew the perennial “Muslim terrorists” did it line.
The fact that I didn't go any further than calling him useless was my being nice. If I said what I really felt about Sen. Reid, then you could call me mean. In fact, you could feasibly ask me if I kissed my late Mother with that mouth....