Voter suppression wins another round in a Pennsylvania courtroom
ABOVE PHOTO: Commonwealth Judge Robert Simpson.
By J. Whyatt Mondesire
Pennsylvania courts are notoriously unjust places.
Unlike appellate judicial decisions coming out of New Jersey, California and New York, our higher courts are among the least quoted and least respected (by other judges) in the nation.
Currently a state Supreme Court justice is under suspension for a series of criminal violations relating to election law. Just a few years ago another justice was forced out of office for lying about his drug use.
And only last year, two Scranton area judges were convicted of selling their offices for large bribes received when they sentenced young children to penal facilities, many times on specious and trumped up charges.
So, last week's decision by a Republican Commonwealth Court Judge to uphold a hastily written and highly restrictive voter-id law should have surprised no one. After all, it was a leading GOP legislator who bragged earlier this summer than passage of such a law would help push Pennsylvania's 20 electoral votes into Mitt Romney's column.
But blatant partisanship didn't matter to Commonwealth Judge Robert Simpson who ruled against the lawsuit seeking an injunction to block the new voter-id law from taking effect in time for the Nov. 6 presidential election.
In a 70-page opinion dripping in political partisanship, Judge Simpson ruled that it really didn't matter how many thousands of elderly, black, brown or young Pennsylvanians were denied their franchise because of the inconvenience of the new law. State legislators, he said, had the ultimate right to decide who votes and who can't.
Simpson's ruling also did not rely on any provable need for the new restrictions—allegedly to stop so-called "voter fraud." That's because the governor's team in defending the law openly admitted there was no record of fraud anywhere in the Commonwealth for more than a decade.
Judge Simpson even went so far as to express faith in a state bureaucracy which has defended its actions by amending certain provisions in the law only after critics pointed out certain blatant deficiencies. Among the most blatant, that non-driving identification cards were not always available for free.
Last spring, when the law was originally passed, such i.d. cards cost $14.50 and required a birth certificate with a raised seal. Those requirements were only dropped in the last 60 days amid protests and demonstrations outside a handful of PennDOT offices around the state.
Unchanged however, is the fact that in 10 of the Keystone State's 67 counties, there are no PennDOT offices and in a handful of others, the offices close in the early afternoon and have staffs still unfamiliar with the latest rules.
The actual number of persons who are eligible to vote but who lack a picture i.d. card with an expiration date that is issued by a government agency ranges from 750,000 to over 1.2 million. These are not the NAACP or ACLU numbers but rather "guesstimates" supplied by state officials hired by Gov. Tom Corbett and testified to in open court in front of Judge Simpson.
In the face of such evidence, Judge Simpson simply shrugged it off. He called the new law a "minor change" adding that state promises that these people (however many there are) would be okay with the alternative i.d. that is coming in the next several weeks. And if they still had trouble, said a very callous Simpson, they could always go back to court in their local jurisdictions.
Hey, who said justice in Pennsylvania was fair?
Finally, a just decision it seems would have been based on evidence that a compelling set of circumstances dictated any shrinkage of voting privileges—regarded by most Americans as among the most fundamental and sacred rights we have as citizens of this country.
In legal terms this is known as the "strict scrutiny" standard, where judges adhere to the letter as well as the intent of the constitution. Judge Simpson wrote that he did not use the "strict scrutiny" standard in this case. If he had, he admitted, he might have reached a different conclusion.
Why he failed to live up to the strict scrutiny standard on a case of such magnitude was never explained. But when did Keystone State judges stop acting like so many Keystone cops?
+ Top Story
Our work doesn't stop at America's borders, and I want you to know what your support has made possible. In the wake of the devastating 2010 earthquake in Haiti, the NAACP funded four projects with the $200,000 that incredible NAACP supporters like you donated to help the country rebuild.
The NAACP views it as "lynching's cousin". In a nutshell, that's the reason that NAACP President/CEO Benjamin Todd Jealous predicts the end to the death penalty in America within the next 10 years. "We're moving fast," says Jealous. "This is one of our top national priorities as it has been for the last 104 years..."
On Monday, January 14, 2013, at 8:50am, a five year-old female student was abducted from Bryant Elementary school, located at 6001 Cedar Avenue. The child was taken out of the Hazel Street exit of the school, then left on 61st Street.
It was a very tragic year from its opening moments and except for a few brief successes—presidential re-election and Summer Olympics—the overarching narrative of 2012 has been wanton destruction, bloody mayhem, tragic loss, especially among our most innocent... the children.
A Florida judge has denied defense requests to end 24-hour GPS monitoring of George Zimmerman while he is out on bond in the fatal shooting of Florida teenager Trayvon Martin. Judge Debra Nelson denied bond requests from Zimmerman's defense team Tuesday.
Wearing a T-shirt with his son's picture on it that says "Kill Guns, Not Kids," Ron Davis said he is staying positive and focused four days after laying his son to rest. He is organizing a candlelight vigil that will be held at Friendship Fountain on Saturday, December 15th.
President - Barack Obama (D)
Vice President - Joe Biden (D)
U.S. Senate - Bob Casey Jr. (D)
Racial attitudes have not improved in the four years since the US elected its first black president, an Associated Press poll finds, as a slight majority of Americans now express prejudice toward blacks whether they recognize those feelings or not.